[Mon May  7 11:54:45 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (281.0, 436.9) = 14 40 52.40 -62 27 26.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 702.3 +/- 40.8
  Background counts = 269.2
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0006

[Mon May  7 11:55:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.12'
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.49"
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.912
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 98 for pass 0, mean size = 11.49"
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src98.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:02:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:41 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 12 23:04:39 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 6021.780000, observed total counts = 5997.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:39 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 69 = 4.001431 pixels
[Sat May 12 23:04:39 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 98 to 75
[Sat May 12 23:04:39 2012] 5853.390000 total counts/ 4097.690000 bgd. counts: snr = 27.427155
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 69 = 4.001431 pixels
  Position = (277.9, 434.4) = 14 40 54.34 -62 27 37.4
  Extent = 22.4 (19.8-44.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 1755.7 +/- 76.5
  Background counts = 4097.7
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.001
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source is confused with source 109
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source is confused with source 110
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 22.41"
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] source mask rpix=5.2, npix_max = 127, mask sum = 132, frac = 1.033
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 97 for pass 1, mean size = 22.41"