[Mon May  7 11:54:42 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (341.2, 259.9) = 14 40 14.44 -62 40 17.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 1530.6 +/- 56.0
  Background counts = 233.3
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.0009

[Mon May  7 11:55:31 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.17'
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.51"
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.035
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 46 for pass 0, mean size = 8.51"
[Sat May 12 23:02:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src46.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src46.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src46_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src46.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src46_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src46.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:02:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src46.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src46_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:39 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src46 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 12 23:04:38 2012] Source 54 is offset by 3.542484 and -5.710354 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.957292 x 0.957292, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 12 23:04:39 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 12373.800000, observed total counts = 12362.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:39 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 54 = 9.098863 pixels
[Sat May 12 23:04:39 2012] 11499.110000 total counts/ 9977.000000 bgd. counts: snr = 15.238635
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 54 = 9.098863 pixels
  Position = (348.8, 254.9) = 14 40 9.64 -62 40 37.8
  Extent = 17.0 (17.0-34.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 1522.1 +/- 107.2
  Background counts = 9977.0
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.001
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 17.03"
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] source mask rpix=3.9, npix_max = 77, mask sum = 67, frac = 0.859
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 46 for pass 1, mean size = 17.03"