[Mon May  7 11:54:36 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (274.0, 239.3) = 14 40 56.91 -62 41 46.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 5945.5 +/- 103.3
  Background counts = 765.5
  Rate = 0.1 +/- 0.002

[Mon May  7 11:55:31 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.64'
[Sat May 12 06:21:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.75 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 06:21:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.75"
[Sat May 12 06:21:53 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 29, frac = 1.150
[Sat May 12 06:21:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 8.75"
[Sat May 12 23:02:35 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:35 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:35 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 12 23:02:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:38 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:04:38 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 29 at 11.392810 pixels away
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.75 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.75"
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 29, frac = 1.150
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 8.75"