[Mon May  7 11:55:26 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (318.9, 208.9) = 14 40 28.53 -62 43 58.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 372.1 +/- 32.1
  Background counts = 175.6
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.0007

[Mon May  7 11:55:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.66'
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.76 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.76"
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.196
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 114 for pass 0, mean size = 9.76"
[Sat May 12 23:04:39 2012] Source 241 is offset by -4.725678 and -3.479217 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.072772 x 1.072772, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 23:04:41 2012] Source is confused with source 248
[Sat May 12 23:04:41 2012] Source is confused with source 246
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.76 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.76"
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.196
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 113 for pass 1, mean size = 9.76"