[Mon May  7 11:55:25 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (295.9, 191.0) = 14 40 43.08 -62 45 16.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 493.0 +/- 34.7
  Background counts = 162.6
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0009

[Mon May  7 11:55:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.79'
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.32 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.32"
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.090
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 84 for pass 0, mean size = 10.32"
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:02:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:40 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Warning, spatial fit 84 centroid is now closest to src. 255
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source is confused with source 111
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source is confused with source 255
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source is confused with source 253
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.32 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.32"
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.090
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 83 for pass 1, mean size = 10.32"