[Mon May  7 11:55:23 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (251.2, 237.1) = 14 41 11.32 -62 41 54.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 742.5 +/- 49.6
  Background counts = 673.9
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.001

[Mon May  7 11:55:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.61'
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.24 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.24"
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 29, frac = 1.054
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 64 for pass 0, mean size = 9.24"
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src64.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src64.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src64_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src64.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src64_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src64.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:02:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src64.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src64.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src64_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src64.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src64_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src64.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:04:39 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 10554.300000, observed total counts = 7975.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:39 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 228
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source is confused with source 226
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.24 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.24"
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 29, frac = 1.054
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 63 for pass 1, mean size = 9.24"