[Mon May  7 11:55:20 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (252.4, 246.2) = 14 41 10.58 -62 41 15.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 485.9 +/- 45.6
  Background counts = 693.8
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0009

[Mon May  7 11:55:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.05'
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.95 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.95"
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.955
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 99 for pass 0, mean size = 8.95"
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:02:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:04:39 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 11953.700000, observed total counts = 11953.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:39 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 219 = 5.170481 pixels
[Sat May 12 23:04:39 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 99 to 69
[Sat May 12 23:04:39 2012] 11985.340000 total counts/ 10600.500000 bgd. counts: snr = 13.450438
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 219 = 5.170481 pixels
  Position = (253.4, 251.2) = 14 41 9.90 -62 40 53.9
  Extent = 17.4 (17.4-34.9)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 1384.8 +/- 109.5
  Background counts = 10600.5
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source is confused with source 217
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 17.45"
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] source mask rpix=4.0, npix_max = 81, mask sum = 81, frac = 0.995
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 98 for pass 1, mean size = 17.45"