[Mon May  7 11:54:34 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (326.4, 285.1) = 14 40 23.84 -62 38 26.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 5051.3 +/- 94.5
  Background counts = 368.1
  Rate = 0.08 +/- 0.001

[Mon May  7 11:55:31 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.24'
[Sat May 12 06:21:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.55 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 06:21:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.55"
[Sat May 12 06:21:53 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.000
[Sat May 12 06:21:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 0, mean size = 7.55"
[Sat May 12 23:02:35 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:35 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:35 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 12 23:02:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:38 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:04:38 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 28030.000000, observed total counts = 27440.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:38 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 20 = 5.220219 pixels
[Sat May 12 23:04:38 2012] 27454.170000 total counts/ 25600.000000 bgd. counts: snr = 11.588563
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 20 = 5.220219 pixels
  Position = (326.5, 279.9) = 14 40 23.75 -62 38 49.5
  Extent = 16.2" x 16.2", rotation angle = -0
  Source counts = 1854.2 +/- 165.7
  Background counts = 25600.0
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.002
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source is confused with source 18
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 16.19"
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] source mask rpix=3.7, npix_max = 71, mask sum = 47, frac = 0.659
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 16.19"