[Mon May  7 11:55:09 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (280.0, 352.0) = 14 40 53.09 -62 33 31.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 822.8 +/- 43.8
  Background counts = 332.8
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.0009

[Mon May  7 11:55:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.11'
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.48 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.48"
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.541
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 61 for pass 0, mean size = 8.48"
[Sat May 12 23:02:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:02:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:04:39 2012] Source 167 is offset by -5.946538 and 7.105265 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.007926 x 1.007926, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.48 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.48"
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.541
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 60 for pass 1, mean size = 8.48"