[Mon May  7 11:55:02 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (290.0, 382.9) = 14 40 46.74 -62 31 20.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 703.0 +/- 39.2
  Background counts = 506.4
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0008

[Mon May  7 11:55:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.16'
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.51"
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.040
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 74 for pass 0, mean size = 9.51"
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:02:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 23:02:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74.csv
[Sat May 12 23:02:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:04:39 2012] Warning, spatial fit 74 centroid is now closest to src. 153
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source is confused with source 6
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.51"
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.040
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 73 for pass 1, mean size = 9.51"