[Mon May  7 11:55:00 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (248.0, 397.0) = 14 41 13.15 -62 30 20.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 379.9 +/- 36.1
  Background counts = 371.5
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.0009

[Mon May  7 11:55:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.03'
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.44"
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 34, frac = 1.010
[Sat May 12 06:21:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 101 for pass 0, mean size = 10.44"
[Sat May 12 23:04:38 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 6489.990000, observed total counts = 5086.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:38 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 133
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:04:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.44"
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 34, frac = 1.010
[Wed May 16 15:23:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 100 for pass 1, mean size = 10.44"