[Mon May  7 11:54:26 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (171.7, 179.3) = 14 42 1.77 -62 46 3.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 1222.4 +/- 48.6
  Background counts = 160.5
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.0007

[Mon May  7 11:54:26 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.61'
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.73 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.73"
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 39, frac = 0.830
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 89 for pass 0, mean size = 12.73"
[Sat May 12 06:21:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Sat May 12 06:21:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Sat May 12 06:21:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 06:21:53 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.csv
[Sat May 12 06:21:53 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.csv
[Sat May 12 06:21:53 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Warning, spatial fit 89 centroid is now closest to src. 287
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.73 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.73"
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 39, frac = 0.830
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 81 for pass 1, mean size = 12.73"
[Wed May 16 15:23:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 15:23:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.csv
[Wed May 16 15:23:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 15:23:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.csv
[Wed May 16 15:23:02 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 16 15:23:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 15:23:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.csv
[Wed May 16 15:23:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 15:23:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.csv
[Wed May 16 15:23:06 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes