[Mon May  7 11:54:19 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (252.6, 237.1) = 14 41 10.42 -62 41 56.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 691.5 +/- 46.3
  Background counts = 531.7
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.001

[Mon May  7 11:54:26 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.55'
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.20 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.20"
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.877
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 84 for pass 0, mean size = 9.20"
[Sat May 12 06:21:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:50 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 12 06:21:53 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.csv
[Sat May 12 06:21:53 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.csv
[Sat May 12 06:21:53 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:04:06 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 9954.220000, observed total counts = 9618.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:06 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 262 = 1.228171 pixels
[Sat May 12 23:04:06 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 84 to 70
[Sat May 12 23:04:06 2012] 10276.610000 total counts/ 8297.870000 bgd. counts: snr = 21.722281
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 262 = 1.228171 pixels
  Position = (253.0, 235.9) = 14 41 10.21 -62 42 0.7
  Extent = 18.1 (18.1-36.3)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 1978.7 +/- 101.4
  Background counts = 8297.9
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.001
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Source is confused with source 267
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 18.13"
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] source mask rpix=4.2, npix_max = 87, mask sum = 68, frac = 0.780
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 76 for pass 1, mean size = 18.13"
[Wed May 16 15:23:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 15:23:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.csv
[Wed May 16 15:23:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 15:23:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.csv
[Wed May 16 15:23:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 16 15:23:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 15:23:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76.csv
[Wed May 16 15:23:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 15:23:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76.csv
[Wed May 16 15:23:06 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes