[Mon May  7 11:54:15 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (270.4, 252.2) = 14 40 59.16 -62 40 52.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 884.1 +/- 50.4
  Background counts = 516.7
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.001

[Mon May  7 11:54:26 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.92'
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.39"
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.975
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 78 for pass 0, mean size = 8.39"
[Sat May 12 06:21:49 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78.csv
[Sat May 12 06:21:49 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78.csv
[Sat May 12 06:21:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 06:21:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:52 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 12 23:04:06 2012] Warning, spatial fit 78 centroid is now closest to src. 249
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Source 241 is offset by -2.294153 and 9.057874 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 7.864874 x 0.983113, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Source is confused with source 246
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Source is confused with source 242
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.39"
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.975
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 70 for pass 1, mean size = 8.39"
[Wed May 16 15:23:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src70.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 15:23:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src70_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 15:23:01 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src70 appears to have run properly
[Wed May 16 15:23:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src70.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 15:23:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src70_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 15:23:05 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src70 appears to have run properly