[Mon May  7 11:54:05 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (321.1, 326.2) = 14 40 27.16 -62 35 28.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 1837.3 +/- 58.4
  Background counts = 184.5
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.0009

[Mon May  7 11:54:26 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.60'
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.73 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.73"
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 11, frac = 0.531
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 60 for pass 0, mean size = 7.73"
[Sat May 12 06:21:49 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60.csv
[Sat May 12 06:21:49 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60.csv
[Sat May 12 06:21:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 06:21:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:52 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 12 23:04:06 2012] Source 186 is offset by 5.199610 and 6.139519 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.068952 x 3.068952, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Source 186 is offset by 0.739197 and -6.187561 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.092818 x 2.092818, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.73 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.73"
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 11, frac = 0.531
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 54 for pass 1, mean size = 7.73"
[Wed May 16 15:23:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 15:23:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 15:23:01 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54 appears to have run properly
[Wed May 16 15:23:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 15:23:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 15:23:05 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54 appears to have run properly