[Mon May  7 11:54:00 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (303.9, 369.7) = 14 40 38.00 -62 32 20.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 1930.4 +/- 60.4
  Background counts = 291.7
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.001

[Mon May  7 11:54:26 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.18'
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.02"
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.755
[Thu May 10 23:27:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 52 for pass 0, mean size = 9.02"
[Sat May 12 06:21:49 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.csv
[Sat May 12 06:21:49 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.csv
[Sat May 12 06:21:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 06:21:51 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52.csv
[Sat May 12 06:21:51 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 06:21:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52.csv
[Sat May 12 06:21:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 23:04:05 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 19527.100000, observed total counts = 18513.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:05 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 152 = 5.359020 pixels
[Sat May 12 23:04:05 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 52 to 35
[Sat May 12 23:04:05 2012] 19534.910000 total counts/ 15972.900000 bgd. counts: snr = 28.184040
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 152 = 5.359020 pixels
  Position = (306.9, 365.3) = 14 40 36.16 -62 32 38.2
  Extent = 18.2 (18.2-36.3)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 3562.0 +/- 139.8
  Background counts = 15972.9
  Rate = 0.05 +/- 0.002
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 23:04:07 2012] Source is confused with source 29
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 18.16"
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] source mask rpix=4.2, npix_max = 87, mask sum = 39, frac = 0.446
[Tue May 15 06:48:28 2012] Skipping simple spatial due to low active detector fraction