[Sat Dec 31 13:38:02 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (273.2, 378.0) = 14 42 13.92 -62 8 54.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 180.4 +/- 23.0
  Background counts = 102.2
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0004

[Sat Dec 31 13:38:05 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.05'
[Sun Jan  1 11:59:28 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.45 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jan  1 11:59:28 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.45"
[Sun Jan  1 11:59:28 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.259
[Sun Jan  1 11:59:28 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 69 for pass 0, mean size = 9.45"
[Sun Jan  1 23:37:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.ximg exists
[Sun Jan  1 23:37:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jan  1 23:37:00 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jan  1 23:37:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.ximg exists
[Sun Jan  1 23:37:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jan  1 23:37:05 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jan  1 23:38:53 2012] Source 95 is offset by -0.557673 and -5.635269 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.396110 x 2.396110, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jan  1 23:38:54 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jan  1 23:38:54 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jan  1 23:38:54 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jan  1 23:38:54 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jan  1 23:38:54 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jan  1 23:38:54 2012] Source is confused with source 83
[Tue Jan  3 05:59:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.45 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jan  3 05:59:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.45"
[Tue Jan  3 05:59:05 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.259
[Tue Jan  3 05:59:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 67 for pass 1, mean size = 9.45"
[Tue Jan  3 21:34:51 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.ximg exists
[Tue Jan  3 21:34:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.csv
[Tue Jan  3 21:34:51 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jan  3 21:34:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.csv
[Tue Jan  3 21:34:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jan  3 21:34:55 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67.ximg exists
[Tue Jan  3 21:34:55 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jan  3 21:34:55 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67 appears to have run properly
[Tue Jan  3 21:36:36 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1983.470000, observed total counts = 1975.000000
[Tue Jan  3 21:36:36 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 95 = 0.765409 pixels
[Tue Jan  3 21:36:36 2012] 2013.715400 total counts/ 1993.750000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.447139
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 95 = 0.765409 pixels
  Position = (272.8, 378.7) = 14 42 14.14 -62 8 52.3
  Extent = 2.4" x 2.4", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 20.0 +/- 44.9
  Background counts = 1993.8
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 0.0006
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability