[Thu Nov 24 05:20:00 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (407.8, 288.7) = 14 44 33.44 -62 30 21.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 114.7 +/- 18.3
  Background counts = 59.3
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0002

[Thu Nov 24 05:20:01 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.96'
[Thu Nov 24 10:53:33 2011] Using EEF radius (= 10.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Nov 24 10:53:33 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.41"
[Thu Nov 24 10:53:33 2011] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 32, frac = 0.956
[Thu Nov 24 10:53:33 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 110 for pass 0, mean size = 10.41"
[Fri Nov 25 01:01:52 2011] Source 86 is offset by -3.721175 and -1.237696 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.204662 x 1.204662, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Nov 25 01:01:52 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Nov 25 01:01:52 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Nov 25 01:01:52 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Nov 25 01:01:52 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Nov 25 01:01:52 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Nov 25 01:01:52 2011] Source is confused with source 106
[Fri Nov 25 15:11:47 2011] Using EEF radius (= 10.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Nov 25 15:11:47 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.41"
[Fri Nov 25 15:11:47 2011] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 32, frac = 0.956
[Fri Nov 25 15:11:47 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 95 for pass 1, mean size = 10.41"
[Fri Nov 25 23:57:16 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95.ximg exists
[Fri Nov 25 23:57:16 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95.csv
[Fri Nov 25 23:57:16 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95_1.ximg exists
[Fri Nov 25 23:57:16 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95.csv
[Fri Nov 25 23:57:16 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Nov 25 23:57:19 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95.ximg exists
[Fri Nov 25 23:57:19 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95_1.ximg exists
[Fri Nov 25 23:57:19 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504810201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95 appears to have run properly
[Sat Nov 26 11:50:59 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 1776.850000, observed total counts = 1774.000000
[Sat Nov 26 11:50:59 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 86 = 8.503245 pixels
[Sat Nov 26 11:50:59 2011] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 95 to 63
[Sat Nov 26 11:50:59 2011] 1783.340013 total counts/ 1783.340000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000000
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 86 = 8.503245 pixels
  Position = (416.2, 287.2) = 14 44 28.19 -62 30 23.5
  Extent = 24.3" x 24.3", rotation angle = -0
  Source counts = 0.0 +/- 42.2
  Background counts = 1783.3
  Rate = 2e-10 +/- 0.0006
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability