[Fri Dec  2 20:28:32 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (367.6, 373.2) = 14 45 41.92 -62 14 0.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 121.2 +/- 23.6
  Background counts = 217.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Fri Dec  2 20:28:34 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.38'
[Fri Dec  2 20:39:35 2011] Using EEF radius (= 10.12 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Dec  2 20:39:35 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.12"
[Fri Dec  2 20:39:35 2011] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.939
[Fri Dec  2 20:39:35 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 67 for pass 0, mean size = 10.12"
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:13 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg exists
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:13 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:13 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:13 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:13 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:15 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.ximg exists
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:15 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:15 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67 appears to have run properly
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:31 2011] Source 70 is offset by 9.907830 and -0.892548 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.166668 x 1.166668, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:31 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:31 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:31 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:31 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:31 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Dec  3 16:58:19 2011] Using EEF radius (= 10.12 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Dec  3 16:58:19 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.12"
[Sat Dec  3 16:58:19 2011] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.939
[Sat Dec  3 16:58:19 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 63 for pass 1, mean size = 10.12"
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:09 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63.ximg exists
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:09 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63_1.ximg exists
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:09 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63 appears to have run properly
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:10 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63.ximg exists
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:10 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63_1.ximg exists
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:10 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63 appears to have run properly
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:36 2011] Warning: source 63 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 70 at 13.033560 pixels away
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:36 2011] Warning: source 69 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 70 at 28.674777 pixels away
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:36 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:36 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:36 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:36 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:36 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:36 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9