[Fri Dec  2 20:28:31 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (246.9, 397.9) = 14 46 57.01 -62 12 8.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 142.6 +/- 22.8
  Background counts = 194.5
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Fri Dec  2 20:28:34 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.12'
[Fri Dec  2 20:39:35 2011] Using EEF radius (= 10.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Dec  2 20:39:35 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.49"
[Fri Dec  2 20:39:35 2011] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.062
[Fri Dec  2 20:39:35 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 59 for pass 0, mean size = 10.49"
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:13 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.ximg exists
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:13 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.csv
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:13 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:13 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.csv
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:13 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:15 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59.ximg exists
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:15 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:15 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59 appears to have run properly
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:31 2011] Warning: source 59 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 62 at 14.524528 pixels away
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:31 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:31 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:31 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:31 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:31 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Dec  3 16:58:19 2011] Using EEF radius (= 10.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Dec  3 16:58:19 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.49"
[Sat Dec  3 16:58:19 2011] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.062
[Sat Dec  3 16:58:19 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 57 for pass 1, mean size = 10.49"
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:09 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.ximg exists
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:09 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57_1.ximg exists
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:09 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57 appears to have run properly
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:10 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57.ximg exists
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:10 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57_1.ximg exists
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:10 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57 appears to have run properly
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:36 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 1590.130000, observed total counts = 1586.000000
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:36 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 62 = 0.352095 pixels
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:36 2011] 1572.251100 total counts/ 1523.090000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.259676
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 62 = 0.352095 pixels
  Position = (246.8, 398.2) = 14 46 57.09 -62 12 9.4
  Extent = 2.6" x 2.6", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 49.2 +/- 39.7
  Background counts = 1523.1
  Rate = 0.0005 +/- 0.0004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability