[Fri Dec  2 20:28:31 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (285.0, 147.5) = 14 46 33.42 -62 30 27.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 119.9 +/- 20.2
  Background counts = 150.1
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Fri Dec  2 20:28:34 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.99'
[Fri Dec  2 20:39:35 2011] Using EEF radius (= 11.92 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Dec  2 20:39:35 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.92"
[Fri Dec  2 20:39:35 2011] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.619
[Fri Dec  2 20:39:35 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 53 for pass 0, mean size = 11.92"
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:13 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53.ximg exists
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:13 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53.csv
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:13 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:13 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53.csv
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:13 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:15 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53.ximg exists
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:15 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53.csv
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:15 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:15 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53.csv
[Sat Dec  3 05:48:15 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:31 2011] Warning, spatial fit 53 centroid is now closest to src. 126
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:31 2011] Warning: source 57 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 56 at 15.501029 pixels away
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:31 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:31 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:31 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:31 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:31 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Dec  3 16:58:19 2011] Using EEF radius (= 11.92 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Dec  3 16:58:19 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.92"
[Sat Dec  3 16:58:19 2011] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.619
[Sat Dec  3 16:58:19 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 51 for pass 1, mean size = 11.92"
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:09 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src51.ximg exists
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:09 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src51.csv
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:09 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src51_1.ximg exists
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:09 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src51.csv
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:09 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src51_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src51.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:10 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src51.ximg exists
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:10 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src51.csv
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:10 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src51_1.ximg exists
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:10 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src51.csv
[Sun Dec  4 01:59:10 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src51_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src51.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:36 2011] Warning, spatial fit 51 centroid is now closest to src. 60
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:36 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:36 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:36 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:36 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:36 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:36 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9