[Fri Dec  2 20:31:33 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (131.9, 259.1) = 14 48 9.09 -62 22 12.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 155.9 +/- 18.7
  Background counts = 47.0
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Fri Dec  2 20:31:34 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.40'
[Sat Dec  3 12:28:30 2011] Using EEF radius (= 12.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Dec  3 12:28:30 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.63"
[Sat Dec  3 12:28:30 2011] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.777
[Sat Dec  3 12:28:30 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 101 for pass 0, mean size = 12.63"
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:55 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:55 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:55 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:55 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Dec  3 16:57:55 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Dec  4 08:08:37 2011] Using EEF radius (= 12.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Dec  4 08:08:37 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.63"
[Sun Dec  4 08:08:37 2011] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.777
[Sun Dec  4 08:08:37 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 97 for pass 1, mean size = 12.63"
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:19 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.ximg exists
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:19 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.csv
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:19 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97_1.ximg exists
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:19 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.csv
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:19 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src97.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:20 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97.ximg exists
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:20 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97_1.ximg exists
[Sun Dec  4 15:56:20 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504810101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src97 appears to have run properly
[Sun Dec  4 15:57:00 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 594.652000, observed total counts = 595.000000
[Sun Dec  4 15:57:00 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 99 = 0.223143 pixels
[Sun Dec  4 15:57:00 2011] 602.692200 total counts/ 520.318000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.611244
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 99 = 0.223143 pixels
  Position = (132.1, 258.9) = 14 48 9.02 -62 22 13.1
  Extent = 4.8 (3.4-7.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 82.4 +/- 24.5
  Background counts = 520.3
  Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0002
[Sun Dec  4 15:57:00 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Dec  4 15:57:00 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Dec  4 15:57:00 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sun Dec  4 15:57:00 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Dec  4 15:57:00 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Dec  4 15:57:00 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9