[Mon May 21 14:50:17 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (267.1, 308.0) = 14 7 41.08 -27 2 3.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 255.6 +/- 36.3
  Background counts = 492.8
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Mon May 21 14:50:18 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.37'
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.62"
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.790
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 0, mean size = 7.62"
[Wed May 23 03:41:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 03:41:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Wed May 23 03:41:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 03:41:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Wed May 23 03:41:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 03:41:43 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 03:41:43 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 03:41:43 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22 appears to have run properly
[Wed May 23 03:42:34 2012] Source 43 is offset by 7.134494 and 5.290229 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.624216 x 2.624216, not incorporating fit results
[Wed May 23 03:42:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 23 03:42:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 23 03:42:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 23 03:42:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 23 03:42:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 23 03:42:34 2012] Source is confused with source 45
[Wed May 23 10:02:19 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 23 10:02:19 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.62"
[Wed May 23 10:02:19 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.790
[Wed May 23 10:02:19 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 7.62"
[Wed May 23 13:15:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 13:15:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 13:15:41 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22 appears to have run properly
[Wed May 23 13:15:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 13:15:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 13:15:41 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22 appears to have run properly
[Wed May 23 13:16:27 2012] Source 43 is offset by 7.134494 and 5.093355 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.571899 x 2.571899, not incorporating fit results
[Wed May 23 13:16:27 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 23 13:16:27 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 23 13:16:27 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 23 13:16:27 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 23 13:16:27 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00