[Mon May 21 14:50:15 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (318.2, 340.9) = 14 7 24.45 -26 59 38.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 529.5 +/- 46.8
  Background counts = 604.3
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0004

[Mon May 21 14:50:18 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.39'
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.13 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.13"
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.115
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 8.13"
[Wed May 23 03:41:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 03:41:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Wed May 23 03:41:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 03:41:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Wed May 23 03:41:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 03:41:43 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 03:41:43 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 03:41:43 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Wed May 23 03:42:34 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 8570.360000, observed total counts = 8574.000000
[Wed May 23 03:42:34 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 20 = 9.621065 pixels
[Wed May 23 03:42:34 2012] 8337.386000 total counts/ 7831.380000 bgd. counts: snr = 5.717899
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 20 = 9.621065 pixels
  Position = (311.0, 334.5) = 14 7 26.81 -27 0 6.6
  Extent = 16.3 (16.2-32.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 506.0 +/- 91.3
  Background counts = 7831.4
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0009
[Wed May 23 03:42:34 2012] Source 20 is offset by 4.448713 and -7.651425 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.956166 x 0.956166, not incorporating fit results
[Wed May 23 03:42:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 23 03:42:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 23 03:42:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Wed May 23 03:42:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 23 03:42:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 23 10:02:19 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 23 10:02:19 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Wed May 23 10:02:19 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 16.25"
[Wed May 23 10:02:19 2012] source mask rpix=3.7, npix_max = 71, mask sum = 72, frac = 1.003
[Wed May 23 10:02:19 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 16.25"
[Wed May 23 13:15:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 13:15:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Wed May 23 13:15:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 13:15:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Wed May 23 13:15:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 13:15:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 13:15:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Wed May 23 13:15:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 13:15:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Wed May 23 13:15:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 13:16:27 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 2
[Wed May 23 13:16:27 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 23 13:16:27 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 23 13:16:27 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Wed May 23 13:16:27 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 23 13:16:27 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00