[Mon May 21 14:49:28 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (292.4, 342.4) = 14 7 32.84 -26 59 37.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 836.5 +/- 71.1
  Background counts = 582.5
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.0008

[Mon May 21 14:49:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.22'
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.04"
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.862
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 8.04"
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3 appears to have run properly
[Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Source 9 is offset by -3.962200 and 6.809896 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 4.505504 x 4.505504, not incorporating fit results
[Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 5256.750000, observed total counts = 5229.000000
[Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 2.160956 pixels
[Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 3 to 45
[Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] 5138.087000 total counts/ 4895.700000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.464192
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 2.160956 pixels
  Position = (290.5, 341.4) = 14 7 33.46 -26 59 36.9
  Extent = 16.6 (16.6-33.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 242.4 +/- 71.7
  Background counts = 4895.7
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0007
[Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Source is confused with source 10
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Source is confused with source 8
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Source is confused with source 11
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Source is confused with source 24
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 16.61"
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] source mask rpix=3.8, npix_max = 74, mask sum = 63, frac = 0.845
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 1, mean size = 16.61"
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3 appears to have run properly
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Warning, spatial fit 3 centroid is now closest to src. 24
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00