[Mon May 21 14:49:28 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (236.5, 174.8) = 14 7 51.08 -27 11 40.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 197.1 +/- 26.3 Background counts = 186.2 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0002 [Mon May 21 14:49:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.03' [Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.44" [Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.072 [Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 37 for pass 0, mean size = 11.44" [Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37.ximg exists [Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37_1.ximg exists [Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src37 appears to have run properly [Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37.ximg exists [Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37_1.ximg exists [Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src37 appears to have run properly [Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Warning: source 37 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 4 at 11.317111 pixels away [Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Warning: source 51 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 4 at 13.793468 pixels away [Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.44" [Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.072 [Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 33 for pass 1, mean size = 11.44" [Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33.ximg exists [Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33.csv [Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33_1.ximg exists [Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33.csv [Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33.ximg exists [Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33_1.ximg exists [Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33 appears to have run properly [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Warning: source 33 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 4 at 11.278372 pixels away [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00