[Mon May 21 14:49:31 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (425.7, 328.3) = 14 6 49.46 -27 0 32.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 151.3 +/- 24.3 Background counts = 225.0 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004 [Mon May 21 14:49:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.48' [Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.17 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.17" [Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.957 [Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 27 for pass 0, mean size = 11.17" [Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg exists [Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv [Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg exists [Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv [Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg exists [Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg exists [Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27 appears to have run properly [Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Source 36 is offset by -7.579284 and 3.701878 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.909159 x 1.909159, not incorporating fit results [Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.17 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.17" [Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.957 [Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 1, mean size = 11.17" [Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.ximg exists [Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25_1.ximg exists [Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25 appears to have run properly [Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists [Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists [Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25 appears to have run properly [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Warning: source 25 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 36 at 11.026826 pixels away [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00