[Mon May 21 14:49:30 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (384.5, 343.9) = 14 7 2.87 -26 59 23.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 114.6 +/- 25.0
  Background counts = 272.4
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003

[Mon May 21 14:49:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.06'
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.96 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.96"
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.964
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 50 for pass 0, mean size = 9.96"
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.csv
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.csv
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.csv
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.csv
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Warning: source 50 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 30 at 14.532200 pixels away
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Source is confused with source 33
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.96 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.96"
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.964
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 43 for pass 1, mean size = 9.96"
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.csv
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.csv
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43.csv
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43.csv
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2156.720000, observed total counts = 1932.000000
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 30
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9