[Mon May 21 14:49:29 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (182.3, 472.4) = 14 8 8.65 -26 50 6.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 115.1 +/- 22.1
  Background counts = 165.2
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Mon May 21 14:49:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.17'
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.01"
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 46, frac = 0.830
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 53 for pass 0, mean size = 14.01"
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53.csv
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53.csv
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src53.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53.csv
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53.csv
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Warning, spatial fit 53 centroid is now closest to src. 17
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.01"
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 46, frac = 0.830
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 46 for pass 1, mean size = 14.01"
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src46.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src46.csv
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src46_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src46.csv
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src46_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src46.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 10:02:19 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src46.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src46.csv
[Wed May 23 10:02:19 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src46_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src46.csv
[Wed May 23 10:02:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src46_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src46.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 13:16:00 2012] Warning, spatial fit 37 centroid is now closest to src. 38
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Warning, spatial fit 5 centroid is now closest to src. 10
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Warning, spatial fit 26 centroid is now closest to src. 38
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Warning, spatial fit 27 centroid is now closest to src. 22
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Warning, spatial fit 41 centroid is now closest to src. 24
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1336.880000, observed total counts = 1097.000000
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 16
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9