[Mon May 21 14:49:29 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (233.1, 500.0) = 14 7 52.12 -26 48 4.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 359.1 +/- 30.8
  Background counts = 168.4
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0003

[Mon May 21 14:49:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.36'
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.11"
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 56, mask sum = 64, frac = 1.142
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 14.11"
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Warning: source 17 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 15 at 18.344489 pixels away
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.11"
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 56, mask sum = 64, frac = 1.142
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 14.11"
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1503.570000, observed total counts = 1292.000000
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 15
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00