[Mon May 21 14:49:29 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (272.9, 330.4) = 14 7 39.19 -27 0 30.2 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 540.7 +/- 39.6 Background counts = 508.7 Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.0004 [Mon May 21 14:49:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.96' [Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.91 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.91" [Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.791 [Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 7.91" [Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists [Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists [Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Wed May 23 01:26:14 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Source 13 is offset by -7.334080 and 6.655492 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 7.273747 x 7.273747, not incorporating fit results [Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4419.290000, observed total counts = 4405.000000 [Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 2.879233 pixels [Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 9 to 43 [Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] 4378.592000 total counts/ 4216.320000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.499061 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 2.879233 pixels Position = (270.1, 330.2) = 14 7 40.12 -27 0 25.4 Extent = 7.6 (4.0-16.3)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 162.3 +/- 66.2 Background counts = 4216.3 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0007 [Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Source is confused with source 35 [Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.62" [Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.790 [Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 7.62" [Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists [Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists [Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9 appears to have run properly [Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 5555.970000, observed total counts = 5517.000000 [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 0.798581 pixels [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] 5383.623000 total counts/ 5232.500000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.089180 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 0.798581 pixels Position = (270.9, 330.2) = 14 7 39.86 -27 0 25.3 Extent = 7.2 (4.6-10.6)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 151.1 +/- 73.4 Background counts = 5232.5 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0007 [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4429.080000, observed total counts = 4405.000000 [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 0.083056 pixels [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 9 to 39 [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] 4422.566000 total counts/ 4026.000000 bgd. counts: snr = 6.249979 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 0.083056 pixels Position = (270.9, 330.2) = 14 7 39.85 -27 0 25.6 Extent = 16.3 (16.3-32.7)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 396.6 +/- 66.5 Background counts = 4026.0 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007 [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00