[Mon May 21 14:49:28 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (286.5, 340.1) = 14 7 34.77 -26 59 49.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 820.8 +/- 45.3
  Background counts = 565.3
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.0005

[Mon May 21 14:49:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.14'
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.00 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.00"
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.823
[Tue May 22 22:31:51 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 8.00"
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 01:26:13 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4 appears to have run properly
[Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Warning, spatial fit 4 centroid is now closest to src. 11
[Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 23 03:42:18 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 23 03:42:19 2012] Source is confused with source 9
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.00 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.00"
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.823
[Wed May 23 07:29:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 8.00"
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Wed May 23 10:02:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 23 10:02:18 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4 appears to have run properly
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Source 10 is offset by 6.878337 and -5.880879 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.044202 x 1.044202, not incorporating fit results
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 10 at 13.904604 pixels away
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Warning: source 7 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 10 at 14.480570 pixels away
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Warning: source 13 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 10 at 24.376754 pixels away
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 23 13:16:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00