[Sat Sep 24 08:49:17 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (306.2, 277.0) = 1 52 35.87 36 8 19.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 115.0 +/- 24.2
  Background counts = 219.9
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0007

[Sat Sep 24 08:49:17 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.65'
[Sat Sep 24 10:17:33 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.25 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Sep 24 10:17:33 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.25"
[Sat Sep 24 10:17:33 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.851
[Sat Sep 24 10:17:33 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 0, mean size = 7.25"
[Sat Sep 24 11:09:34 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg exists
[Sat Sep 24 11:09:34 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg exists
[Sat Sep 24 11:09:34 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20 appears to have run properly
[Sat Sep 24 11:09:34 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists
[Sat Sep 24 11:09:34 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists
[Sat Sep 24 11:09:34 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20 appears to have run properly
[Sat Sep 24 12:51:03 2011] Source 22 is offset by -6.020225 and -6.190500 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.372070 x 1.312960, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Sep 24 12:51:03 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Sep 24 12:51:03 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Sep 24 12:51:03 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Sep 24 12:51:03 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Sep 24 12:51:03 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Sep 24 14:59:05 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.25 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Sep 24 14:59:05 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.25"
[Sat Sep 24 14:59:05 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.851
[Sat Sep 24 14:59:05 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 1, mean size = 7.25"
[Sat Sep 24 16:44:29 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg exists
[Sat Sep 24 16:44:29 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv
[Sat Sep 24 16:44:29 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg exists
[Sat Sep 24 16:44:29 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv
[Sat Sep 24 16:44:29 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Sep 24 16:44:30 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists
[Sat Sep 24 16:44:30 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists
[Sat Sep 24 16:44:30 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504780201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20 appears to have run properly
[Sat Sep 24 18:12:12 2011] Warning: source 19 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 22 at 12.309455 pixels away
[Sat Sep 24 18:12:12 2011] Source 22 is offset by -6.231424 and 5.593862 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.904322 x 0.904322, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Sep 24 18:12:12 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Sep 24 18:12:12 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Sep 24 18:12:12 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Sep 24 18:12:12 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Sep 24 18:12:12 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Sep 24 18:12:12 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9