[Tue Jan  3 04:09:58 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (320.0, 433.6) = 12 42 30.93 -62 55 16.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 97.7 +/- 16.5
  Background counts = 64.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Tue Jan  3 04:09:59 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.92'
[Tue Jan  3 05:08:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jan  3 05:08:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.39"
[Tue Jan  3 05:08:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.080
[Tue Jan  3 05:08:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 11.39"
[Tue Jan  3 06:02:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504730101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists
[Tue Jan  3 06:02:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504730101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jan  3 06:02:31 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504730101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8 appears to have run properly
[Tue Jan  3 06:02:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504730101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Tue Jan  3 06:02:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504730101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jan  3 06:02:32 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504730101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8 appears to have run properly
[Tue Jan  3 06:43:25 2012] Warning: source 8 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 11 at 15.041762 pixels away
[Tue Jan  3 06:43:25 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jan  3 06:43:25 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jan  3 06:43:25 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jan  3 06:43:25 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jan  3 06:43:25 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jan  3 07:11:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jan  3 07:11:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.39"
[Tue Jan  3 07:11:47 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.080
[Tue Jan  3 07:11:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 1, mean size = 11.39"
[Tue Jan  3 08:02:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504730101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg exists
[Tue Jan  3 08:02:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504730101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv
[Tue Jan  3 08:02:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504730101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jan  3 08:02:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0504730101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv
[Tue Jan  3 08:02:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0504730101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0504730101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jan  3 08:02:53 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504730101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Tue Jan  3 08:02:53 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0504730101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jan  3 08:02:53 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0504730101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8 appears to have run properly
[Tue Jan  3 08:31:32 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 695.992000, observed total counts = 696.000000
[Tue Jan  3 08:31:32 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.213683 pixels
[Tue Jan  3 08:31:32 2012] 683.820300 total counts/ 649.204000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.358595
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.213683 pixels
  Position = (320.0, 433.3) = 12 42 30.94 -62 55 16.9
  Extent = 2.8" x 2.8", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 34.6 +/- 26.1
  Background counts = 649.2
  Rate = 0.0004 +/- 0.0003
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability