[Thu May  3 10:19:39 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (228.5, 229.8) = 14 43 2.54 -0 43 14.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 65.3 +/- 11.6
  Background counts = 27.7
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Thu May  3 10:19:40 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.10'
[Thu May  3 15:20:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.98 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May  3 15:20:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.98"
[Thu May  3 15:20:53 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 27, frac = 0.865
[Thu May  3 15:20:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 9.98"
[Thu May  3 16:58:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 16:58:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 16:58:46 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23 appears to have run properly
[Thu May  3 16:58:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 16:58:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Thu May  3 16:58:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 16:58:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Thu May  3 16:58:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May  3 16:59:24 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 316.289000, observed total counts = 289.000000
[Thu May  3 16:59:24 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 29 = 0.086627 pixels
[Thu May  3 16:59:24 2012] 320.328500 total counts/ 289.672000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.801231
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 29 = 0.086627 pixels
  Position = (228.6, 229.7) = 14 43 2.52 -0 43 15.1
  Extent = 3.7" x 2.1", rotation angle = 76
  Source counts = 30.7 +/- 17.9
  Background counts = 289.7
  Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0005
[Thu May  3 16:59:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May  3 16:59:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May  3 16:59:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May  3 16:59:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May  3 16:59:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.80
[Thu May  3 16:59:24 2012] Source is asymmetric
[Thu May  3 22:12:33 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May  3 22:12:33 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 2.91"
[Thu May  3 22:12:33 2012] source mask rpix=0.7, npix_max = 5, mask sum = 6, frac = 1.098
[Thu May  3 22:12:33 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 1, mean size = 2.91"
[Thu May  3 23:42:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 23:42:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Thu May  3 23:42:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 23:42:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Thu May  3 23:42:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May  3 23:42:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 23:42:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 23:42:40 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Thu May  3 23:43:17 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 313.354000, observed total counts = 289.000000
[Thu May  3 23:43:17 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 29 = 0.123677 pixels
[Thu May  3 23:43:17 2012] 317.384300 total counts/ 281.193000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.158251
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 29 = 0.123677 pixels
  Position = (228.5, 229.8) = 14 43 2.55 -0 43 14.8
  Extent = 3.6 (1.4-5.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 36.2 +/- 17.8
  Background counts = 281.2
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0005
[Thu May  3 23:43:17 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May  3 23:43:17 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May  3 23:43:17 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Thu May  3 23:43:17 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May  3 23:43:17 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May  3 23:43:17 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9