[Tue May  8 09:25:47 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (397.4, 190.1) = 9 17 36.59 -12 15 25.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 148.2 +/- 22.0
  Background counts = 354.9
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Tue May  8 09:25:48 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.64'
[Tue May  8 09:53:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.75 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  8 09:53:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.75"
[Tue May  8 09:53:52 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.830
[Tue May  8 09:53:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 73 for pass 0, mean size = 11.75"
[Tue May  8 23:48:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 23:48:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73.csv
[Tue May  8 23:48:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 23:48:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73.csv
[Tue May  8 23:48:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src73.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 23:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 23:48:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73.csv
[Tue May  8 23:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 23:48:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73.csv
[Tue May  8 23:48:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src73.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Source 78 is offset by -5.159027 and 3.669815 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.317310 x 1.317310, not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Warning, spatial fit 73 centroid is now closest to src. 76
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 10 09:30:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.75 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 10 09:30:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.75"
[Thu May 10 09:30:23 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.830
[Thu May 10 09:30:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 64 for pass 1, mean size = 11.75"
[Thu May 10 21:17:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 21:17:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.csv
[Thu May 10 21:17:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 21:17:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.csv
[Thu May 10 21:17:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 21:17:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 21:17:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64.csv
[Thu May 10 21:17:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 21:17:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64.csv
[Thu May 10 21:17:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 02:47:15 2012] Source 78 is offset by -5.159027 and 3.669815 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.317310 x 1.317310, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 12 02:47:15 2012] Warning: source 64 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 78 at 15.375625 pixels away
[Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9