[Tue May  8 09:25:45 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (123.9, 210.3) = 9 18 57.75 -12 13 47.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 181.7 +/- 27.6
  Background counts = 276.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0002

[Tue May  8 09:25:48 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.18'
[Tue May  8 09:53:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.52 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  8 09:53:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.52"
[Tue May  8 09:53:52 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 52, mask sum = 43, frac = 0.826
[Tue May  8 09:53:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 67 for pass 0, mean size = 13.52"
[Tue May  8 23:48:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 23:48:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv
[Tue May  8 23:48:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 23:48:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv
[Tue May  8 23:48:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 23:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 23:48:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.csv
[Tue May  8 23:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 23:48:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.csv
[Tue May  8 23:48:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2813.260000, observed total counts = 1885.000000
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 71
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 10 09:30:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.52 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 10 09:30:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.52"
[Thu May 10 09:30:23 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 52, mask sum = 43, frac = 0.826
[Thu May 10 09:30:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 59 for pass 1, mean size = 13.52"
[Thu May 10 21:17:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 21:17:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59.csv
[Thu May 10 21:17:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 21:17:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59.csv
[Thu May 10 21:17:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 21:17:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 21:17:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59.csv
[Thu May 10 21:17:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 21:17:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59.csv
[Thu May 10 21:17:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 02:47:15 2012] Warning: source 59 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 71 at 14.788979 pixels away
[Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 02:48:11 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(10726.737938, 18243.905792, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat May 12 02:48:11 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src71_src.reg
[Sat May 12 02:48:11 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (86, 173) - (161, 248)
[Sat May 12 02:48:11 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(10726.737938, 18243.905792, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y)
[Sat May 12 02:48:11 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src71.gif
[Sat May 12 05:51:52 2012] Mean detx,y = (-17756.90, -1485.58) 
[Sat May 12 05:51:59 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sat May 12 05:52:47 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sat May 12 05:52:48 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src71_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat May 12 05:52:48 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src71_bgd.pi.gz
[Mon May 14 23:27:42 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Mon May 14 23:27:42 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Tue May 15 08:09:06 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Tue May 15 08:09:06 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src71_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue May 15 08:09:09 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Tue May 15 08:09:09 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00154, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src71.arf
[Tue May 15 08:09:09 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Tue May 15 08:09:09 2012] Updating source flux to 2.6e-14
[Tue May 15 08:18:46 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting