[Tue May  8 09:25:43 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (257.9, 281.1) = 9 18 17.98 -12 8 39.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 499.4 +/- 49.2
  Background counts = 902.1
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.0006

[Tue May  8 09:25:48 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.20'
[Tue May  8 09:53:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.03 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  8 09:53:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.03"
[Tue May  8 09:53:52 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.727
[Tue May  8 09:53:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 58 for pass 0, mean size = 8.03"
[Tue May  8 23:48:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 23:48:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58.csv
[Tue May  8 23:48:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 23:48:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58.csv
[Tue May  8 23:48:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 23:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 23:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 23:48:26 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58 appears to have run properly
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 12755.200000, observed total counts = 9645.000000
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 62
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 8080.570000, observed total counts = 7922.000000
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 62 = 1.255369 pixels
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] 8131.919000 total counts/ 8023.120000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.214656
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 62 = 1.255369 pixels
  Position = (256.8, 280.4) = 9 18 18.30 -12 8 41.9
  Extent = 5.1 (2.2-9.6)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 108.8 +/- 90.2
  Background counts = 8023.1
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability