[Tue May  8 09:25:35 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (302.1, 384.2) = 9 18 4.87 -12 1 14.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 164.8 +/- 37.4
  Background counts = 810.4
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Tue May  8 09:25:48 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.22'
[Tue May  8 09:53:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.54 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  8 09:53:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.54"
[Tue May  8 09:53:52 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.034
[Tue May  8 09:53:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 27 for pass 0, mean size = 9.54"
[Tue May  8 23:48:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 23:48:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Tue May  8 23:48:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 23:48:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Tue May  8 23:48:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 23:48:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 23:48:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.csv
[Tue May  8 23:48:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 23:48:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.csv
[Tue May  8 23:48:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Source 30 is offset by -6.486061 and 1.847227 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.096533 x 1.096533, not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Source is confused with source 25
[Thu May 10 09:30:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.54 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 10 09:30:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.54"
[Thu May 10 09:30:23 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.034
[Thu May 10 09:30:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 26 for pass 1, mean size = 9.54"
[Thu May 10 21:17:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 21:17:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26.csv
[Thu May 10 21:17:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 21:17:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26.csv
[Thu May 10 21:17:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 21:17:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 21:17:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26.csv
[Thu May 10 21:17:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 21:17:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26.csv
[Thu May 10 21:17:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 02:47:15 2012] Warning, spatial fit 26 centroid is now closest to src. 12
[Sat May 12 02:47:15 2012] Source 30 is offset by -3.686383 and 7.962353 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.028074 x 1.028074, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9