[Tue May 8 09:25:34 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (299.3, 388.3) = 9 18 5.70 -12 0 54.2 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 230.9 +/- 38.2 Background counts = 748.4 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005 [Tue May 8 09:25:48 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.51' [Tue May 8 09:53:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.69 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue May 8 09:53:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.69" [Tue May 8 09:53:52 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.807 [Tue May 8 09:53:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 0, mean size = 9.69" [Tue May 8 23:48:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg exists [Tue May 8 23:48:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv [Tue May 8 23:48:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg exists [Tue May 8 23:48:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv [Tue May 8 23:48:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue May 8 23:48:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists [Tue May 8 23:48:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv [Tue May 8 23:48:25 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists [Tue May 8 23:48:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv [Tue May 8 23:48:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 5622.730000, observed total counts = 4363.000000 [Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 25 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu May 10 09:28:51 2012] Source is confused with source 23 [Thu May 10 09:30:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.69 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu May 10 09:30:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.69" [Thu May 10 09:30:23 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.807 [Thu May 10 09:30:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 9.69" [Thu May 10 21:17:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg exists [Thu May 10 21:17:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv [Thu May 10 21:17:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg exists [Thu May 10 21:17:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv [Thu May 10 21:17:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 10 21:17:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists [Thu May 10 21:17:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv [Thu May 10 21:17:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists [Thu May 10 21:17:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv [Thu May 10 21:17:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat May 12 02:47:15 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 5035.570000, observed total counts = 4412.000000 [Sat May 12 02:47:15 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 25 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sat May 12 02:47:15 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 6393.040000, observed total counts = 4865.000000 [Sat May 12 02:47:15 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 25 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat May 12 02:47:16 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat May 12 02:48:10 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(25987.431488, 33733.102448, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat May 12 02:48:10 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src25_src.reg [Sat May 12 02:48:10 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (262, 351) - (337, 426) [Sat May 12 02:48:10 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(25987.431488, 33733.102448, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25939.592600, 27946.472200, 6797.280196, 6797.280196, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24697.648000, 29304.656000, 3714.120107, 3714.120107, -0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24905.424744, 34269.994507, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23591.933960, 36638.609863, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26087.061462, 34100.760284, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24877.052000, 33266.998000, 1467.992042, 1467.992042, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27602.414124, 33260.870972, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27538.762600, 32779.686000, 1531.008044, 1531.008044, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25659.992035, 32885.343628, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25879.226000, 31857.436000, 1467.992042, 1467.992042, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27258.420563, 31890.220062, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23618.871887, 31499.274963, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28138.894000, 31356.086000, 1387.168040, 1387.168040, 5.349000, X, Y) [Sat May 12 02:48:10 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src25.gif [Sat May 12 04:22:53 2012] Mean detx,y = (3744.19, -4722.26) [Sat May 12 04:22:59 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Sat May 12 04:23:41 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Sat May 12 04:23:41 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src25_src_b10.pi.gz [Sat May 12 04:23:41 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src25_bgd.pi.gz [Mon May 14 21:53:12 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Mon May 14 21:53:12 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Tue May 15 08:09:04 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Tue May 15 08:09:05 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src25_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue May 15 08:09:07 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Tue May 15 08:09:07 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00319, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src25.arf [Tue May 15 08:09:07 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Tue May 15 08:09:07 2012] Updating source flux to 1.2e-14 [Tue May 15 08:18:46 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting