[Tue May  8 09:26:20 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (266.1, 399.0) = 9 18 15.53 -11 59 58.1
  Extent = 21.7" x 21.7", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 162.4 +/- 20.8
  Background counts = 942.3
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Tue May  8 09:26:21 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.66'
[Thu May 10 02:09:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 10 02:09:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.26"
[Thu May 10 02:09:29 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 27, frac = 0.826
[Thu May 10 02:09:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 40 for pass 0, mean size = 10.26"
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.csv
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.csv
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 09:28:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 09:28:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.csv
[Thu May 10 09:28:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 09:28:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.csv
[Thu May 10 09:28:14 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 09:29:42 2012] Warning: source 40 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 47 at 10.414938 pixels away
[Thu May 10 09:29:42 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 10 09:29:42 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 10 09:29:42 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 10 09:29:42 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 10 09:29:42 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May 11 21:10:09 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 11 21:10:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.26"
[Fri May 11 21:10:09 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 27, frac = 0.826
[Fri May 11 21:10:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 38 for pass 1, mean size = 10.26"
[Sat May 12 02:46:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 02:46:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38.csv
[Sat May 12 02:46:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 02:46:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38.csv
[Sat May 12 02:46:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 02:46:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 02:46:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38.csv
[Sat May 12 02:46:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 02:46:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38.csv
[Sat May 12 02:46:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Warning: source 38 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 47 at 13.949609 pixels away
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9