[Tue May  8 09:26:19 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (385.8, 209.8) = 9 17 40.01 -12 13 49.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 171.4 +/- 22.4
  Background counts = 154.9
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0004

[Tue May  8 09:26:21 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.02'
[Thu May 10 02:09:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 10 02:09:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.94"
[Thu May 10 02:09:29 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 33, frac = 0.908
[Thu May 10 02:09:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 0, mean size = 10.94"
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.csv
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.csv
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 09:29:42 2012] Warning: source 28 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 43 at 15.172856 pixels away
[Thu May 10 09:29:42 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 10 09:29:42 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 10 09:29:42 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 10 09:29:42 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 10 09:29:42 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May 11 21:10:09 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 11 21:10:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.94"
[Fri May 11 21:10:09 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 33, frac = 0.908
[Fri May 11 21:10:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 1, mean size = 10.94"
[Sat May 12 02:46:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 02:46:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.csv
[Sat May 12 02:46:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 02:46:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.csv
[Sat May 12 02:46:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 02:46:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 02:46:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Sat May 12 02:46:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 02:46:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Sat May 12 02:46:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Warning: source 28 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 43 at 14.656336 pixels away
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9