[Tue May  8 09:26:13 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (471.0, 355.2) = 9 17 14.79 -12 3 23.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 154.0 +/- 20.6
  Background counts = 151.2
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Tue May  8 09:26:21 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.17'
[Thu May 10 02:09:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 10 02:09:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.01"
[Thu May 10 02:09:29 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.718
[Thu May 10 02:09:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 42 for pass 0, mean size = 13.01"
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src42.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src42.csv
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src42_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src42.csv
[Thu May 10 09:28:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src42_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src42.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 09:28:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 09:28:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42.csv
[Thu May 10 09:28:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 10 09:28:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42.csv
[Thu May 10 09:28:14 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 10 09:29:42 2012] Warning: source 42 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 17 at 17.087307 pixels away
[Thu May 10 09:29:42 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 10 09:29:42 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 10 09:29:42 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 10 09:29:42 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 10 09:29:42 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May 11 21:10:09 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 11 21:10:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.01"
[Fri May 11 21:10:09 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.718
[Fri May 11 21:10:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 40 for pass 1, mean size = 13.01"
[Sat May 12 02:46:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src40.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 02:46:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src40.csv
[Sat May 12 02:46:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src40_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 02:46:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src40.csv
[Sat May 12 02:46:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src40_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src40.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 02:46:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src40.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 02:46:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src40.csv
[Sat May 12 02:46:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src40_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 02:46:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src40.csv
[Sat May 12 02:46:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src40_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src40.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Warning: source 40 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 17 at 12.790063 pixels away
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 12 02:47:40 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9