[Sun Apr 29 13:48:03 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (325.3, 306.3) = 0 57 24.44 -26 16 50.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 425.9 +/- 28.2
  Background counts = 65.9
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.0005

[Sun Apr 29 13:48:04 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.03'
[Sun Apr 29 18:28:24 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Apr 29 18:28:24 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.44"
[Sun Apr 29 18:28:24 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.972
[Sun Apr 29 18:28:24 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 7.44"
[Sun Apr 29 20:40:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists
[Sun Apr 29 20:40:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Sun Apr 29 20:40:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists
[Sun Apr 29 20:40:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Sun Apr 29 20:40:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Apr 29 20:40:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Sun Apr 29 20:40:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Sun Apr 29 20:40:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Sun Apr 29 20:40:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Sun Apr 29 20:40:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Apr 29 20:41:25 2012] Warning, spatial fit 3 centroid is now closest to src. 39
[Sun Apr 29 20:41:26 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1857.050000, observed total counts = 1724.000000
[Sun Apr 29 20:41:26 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 1.181523 pixels
[Sun Apr 29 20:41:26 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 3 to 17
[Sun Apr 29 20:41:26 2012] 1870.283600 total counts/ 1773.480000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.298679
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 1.181523 pixels
  Position = (324.5, 305.4) = 0 57 24.70 -26 16 53.1
  Extent = 9.5 (3.4-14.3)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 96.8 +/- 43.2
  Background counts = 1773.5
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0008
[Sun Apr 29 20:41:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Apr 29 20:41:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Apr 29 20:41:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sun Apr 29 20:41:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Apr 29 20:41:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Apr 30 00:46:32 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Apr 30 00:46:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.53"
[Mon Apr 30 00:46:32 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.794
[Mon Apr 30 00:46:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 1, mean size = 9.53"
[Mon Apr 30 02:29:10 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg exists
[Mon Apr 30 02:29:10 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg exists
[Mon Apr 30 02:29:10 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3 appears to have run properly
[Mon Apr 30 02:29:11 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Mon Apr 30 02:29:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Mon Apr 30 02:29:11 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Mon Apr 30 02:29:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Mon Apr 30 02:29:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0504160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Apr 30 02:29:44 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2488.570000, observed total counts = 2272.000000
[Mon Apr 30 02:29:44 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 0.903841 pixels
[Mon Apr 30 02:29:44 2012] 2523.781200 total counts/ 2459.460000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.296983
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 0.903841 pixels
  Position = (324.8, 306.3) = 0 57 24.60 -26 16 49.4
  Extent = 5.5" x 5.5", rotation angle = 1
  Source counts = 64.3 +/- 50.2
  Background counts = 2459.5
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0009
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability