[Sat Mar 24 09:05:53 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (397.5, 275.4) = 14 6 5.89 52 49 46.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 137.3 +/- 17.7
  Background counts = 57.9
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001

[Sat Mar 24 09:05:53 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.37'
[Sat Mar 24 09:09:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.12 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Mar 24 09:09:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.12"
[Sat Mar 24 09:09:57 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.783
[Sat Mar 24 09:09:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 0, mean size = 10.12"
[Sat Mar 24 09:57:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 24 09:57:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.csv
[Sat Mar 24 09:57:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 24 09:57:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.csv
[Sat Mar 24 09:57:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar 24 09:57:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 24 09:57:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Sat Mar 24 09:57:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 24 09:57:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Sat Mar 24 09:57:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar 24 10:37:03 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 398.534000, observed total counts = 353.000000
[Sat Mar 24 10:37:03 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 15
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Mar 24 10:37:03 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Mar 24 10:37:03 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Mar 24 10:37:03 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Mar 24 10:37:03 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Mar 24 10:37:03 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Mar 24 10:37:22 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.12 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Mar 24 10:37:22 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.12"
[Sat Mar 24 10:37:22 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.783
[Sat Mar 24 10:37:22 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 1, mean size = 10.12"
[Sat Mar 24 11:40:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 24 11:40:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.csv
[Sat Mar 24 11:40:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 24 11:40:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.csv
[Sat Mar 24 11:40:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar 24 11:40:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 24 11:40:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Sat Mar 24 11:40:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 24 11:40:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Sat Mar 24 11:40:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar 24 12:21:57 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 397.782000, observed total counts = 353.000000
[Sat Mar 24 12:21:57 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 15
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Mar 24 12:21:57 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Mar 24 12:21:57 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Mar 24 12:21:57 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Mar 24 12:21:57 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Mar 24 12:21:57 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Mar 24 12:22:16 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(34534.477905, 23909.961334, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat Mar 24 12:22:16 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src15_src.reg
[Sat Mar 24 12:22:16 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (360, 238) - (435, 313)
[Sat Mar 24 12:22:16 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(34534.477905, 23909.961334, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y)
[Sat Mar 24 12:22:16 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src15.gif
[Sat Mar 24 12:37:50 2012] Mean detx,y = (4267.96, 8506.40) 
[Sat Mar 24 12:37:55 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sat Mar 24 12:39:02 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sat Mar 24 12:39:03 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src15_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat Mar 24 12:39:03 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src15_bgd.pi.gz
[Sat Mar 24 13:11:18 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sat Mar 24 13:11:18 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sat Mar 24 14:04:13 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sat Mar 24 14:04:13 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src15_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat Mar 24 14:04:14 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sat Mar 24 14:04:14 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0105, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0503960101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src15.arf
[Sat Mar 24 14:04:14 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sat Mar 24 14:04:14 2012] Updating source flux to 4.1e-14
[Sat Mar 24 14:06:31 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting