[Sun Jun  9 09:40:55 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (290.7, 264.6) = 18 0 25.93 -24 4 31.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 137.2 +/- 18.7
  Background counts = 160.5
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Sun Jun  9 09:41:02 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.51'
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.69 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.69"
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.216
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 95 for pass 0, mean size = 7.69"
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:49 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:49 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:49 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Warning, spatial fit 95 centroid is now closest to src. 98
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source is confused with source 98
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source is confused with source 99
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.69 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.69"
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.216
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 92 for pass 1, mean size = 7.69"
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:00 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:00 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:00 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Warning, spatial fit 92 centroid is now closest to src. 98
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:14 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(25238.734467, 22975.311371, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:14 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src97_src.reg
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:14 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (253, 227) - (328, 302)
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:14 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(25238.734467, 22975.311371, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24028.144653, 23773.516724, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24728.647583, 22977.252197, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25717.165436, 22938.316193, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26127.858643, 22863.370026, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26694.905200, 22834.246536, 764.720822, 764.720822, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28129.535675, 22385.881592, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22374.680023, 22490.715424, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23246.976624, 22332.321686, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23790.633698, 22379.642273, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24733.832855, 22292.044891, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26591.493134, 21956.850098, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25977.422028, 22128.026474, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28261.413635, 21537.318298, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22364.574982, 21525.146317, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23370.390350, 21351.859192, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22834.759430, 21360.265015, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25704.551392, 20828.494507, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23877.832825, 21263.292725, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26487.559357, 20634.410538, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25180.852173, 21001.680740, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26069.790497, 20572.394363, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:14 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src97.gif