[Sun Jun  9 09:40:55 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (387.0, 96.8) = 17 59 55.27 -24 16 48.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 94.3 +/- 19.3
  Background counts = 105.1
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Sun Jun  9 09:41:02 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.97'
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] Using EEF radius (= 14.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.41"
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] source mask rpix=3.3, npix_max = 58, mask sum = 64, frac = 1.100
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 94 for pass 0, mean size = 14.41"
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:47 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:49 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:49 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:49 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1185.910000, observed total counts = 728.000000
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 96
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] Using EEF radius (= 14.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.41"
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] source mask rpix=3.3, npix_max = 58, mask sum = 64, frac = 1.100
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 91 for pass 1, mean size = 14.41"
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:59 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src91.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:59 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src91.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:59 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src91_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src91.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:00 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src91_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src91.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src91.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src91.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Warning: source 91 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 96 at 12.330922 pixels away
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:14 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(33623.656830, 8374.942192, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:14 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src96_src.reg
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:14 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (350, 59) - (425, 134)
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:14 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(33623.656830, 8374.942192, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34790.688860, 11330.177000, 2167.336062, 270.916808, 45.515000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32825.252350, 8791.199677, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35300.488373, 8931.057327, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34439.685394, 11292.477554, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33420.167419, 10995.475357, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34060.462250, 10384.311508, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35266.936000, 10692.288000, 2167.336062, 2167.336062, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34509.358673, 9869.888962, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(36097.984833, 9865.861946, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34964.937805, 9352.993256, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:14 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src96.gif