[Sun Jun 9 09:40:55 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (137.1, 287.5) = 18 1 14.68 -24 2 56.7 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 78.3 +/- 17.3 Background counts = 98.2 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006 [Sun Jun 9 09:41:02 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.72' [Sun Jun 9 09:42:43 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.29 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 9 09:42:43 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.29" [Sun Jun 9 09:42:43 2013] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 44, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.950 [Sun Jun 9 09:42:43 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 89 for pass 0, mean size = 12.29" [Sun Jun 9 09:42:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg exists [Sun Jun 9 09:42:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 9 09:42:47 2013] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89 appears to have run properly [Sun Jun 9 09:42:49 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg exists [Sun Jun 9 09:42:49 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 9 09:42:49 2013] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89 appears to have run properly [Sun Jun 9 09:43:25 2013] Source 91 is offset by 0.123540 and 4.619368 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.429660 x 1.429660, not incorporating fit results [Sun Jun 9 09:43:25 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 813.761000, observed total counts = 814.000000 [Sun Jun 9 09:43:25 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 91 = 4.191713 pixels [Sun Jun 9 09:43:25 2013] 789.291000 total counts/ 611.156000 bgd. counts: snr = 7.205651 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 91 = 4.191713 pixels Position = (133.6, 285.4) = 18 1 15.82 -24 3 9.3 Extent = 15.5 (7.1-24.6)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 178.1 +/- 28.1 Background counts = 611.2 Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001 [Sun Jun 9 09:43:25 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Jun 9 09:43:25 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Jun 9 09:43:25 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Sun Jun 9 09:43:25 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Jun 9 09:43:25 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Jun 9 09:43:25 2013] Source is confused with source 94 [Sun Jun 9 09:44:57 2013] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 9 09:44:57 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 15.50" [Sun Jun 9 09:44:57 2013] source mask rpix=3.6, npix_max = 66, mask sum = 72, frac = 1.090 [Sun Jun 9 09:44:57 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 87 for pass 1, mean size = 15.50" [Sun Jun 9 09:44:59 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src87.ximg exists [Sun Jun 9 09:44:59 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src87.csv [Sun Jun 9 09:44:59 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src87_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 9 09:44:59 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src87.csv [Sun Jun 9 09:44:59 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src87_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src87.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 9 09:45:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src87.ximg exists [Sun Jun 9 09:45:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src87.csv [Sun Jun 9 09:45:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src87_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 9 09:45:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src87.csv [Sun Jun 9 09:45:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src87_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src87.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 9 09:45:41 2013] Warning, spatial fit 87 centroid is now closest to src. 94 [Sun Jun 9 09:45:41 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Jun 9 09:45:41 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Jun 9 09:45:41 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Sun Jun 9 09:45:41 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Jun 9 09:45:41 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Jun 9 09:47:14 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(11570.450000, 24778.086000, 929.982027, 929.982027, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sun Jun 9 09:47:14 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src91_src.reg [Sun Jun 9 09:47:14 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (80, 232) - (187, 339) [Sun Jun 9 09:47:14 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(11570.450000, 24778.086000, 1549.970045, 3099.940089, X, Y) && !ellipse(15270.831863, 21530.547974, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(11686.060425, 23561.961334, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(15318.877274, 22959.365265, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(11366.036469, 21957.578903, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(11293.457260, 24038.594849, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(11863.701797, 22120.094574, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sun Jun 9 09:47:14 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src91.gif