[Sun Jun  9 09:40:54 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (327.7, 94.1) = 18 0 14.14 -24 17 1.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 434.9 +/- 30.2
  Background counts = 92.5
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001

[Sun Jun  9 09:41:02 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.96'
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.91 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.91"
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.896
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 74 for pass 0, mean size = 13.91"
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:46 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:46 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:46 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:49 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:49 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:49 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source 76 is offset by 2.608857 and -1.866095 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.600828 x 1.600828, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Warning: source 73 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 76 at 15.128616 pixels away
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Warning, spatial fit 74 centroid is now closest to src. 25
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source is confused with source 25
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.91 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.91"
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.896
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 72 for pass 1, mean size = 13.91"
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:59 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src72.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:59 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src72.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:59 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src72_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:59 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src72.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:59 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src72_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src72.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:01 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src72.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src72.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:01 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src72_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src72.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:01 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src72_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src72.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:40 2013] Source 76 is offset by 2.554880 and -1.846847 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.600828 x 1.600828, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:40 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 5609.290000, observed total counts = 4275.000000
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:40 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 76
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:40 2013] Warning, spatial fit 72 centroid is now closest to src. 66
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:14 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(28463.790588, 8141.854515, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:14 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src76_src.reg
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:14 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (290, 57) - (365, 132)
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:14 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(28463.790588, 8141.854515, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28791.973450, 8150.168739, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26672.112000, 8927.234000, 1840.112053, 1840.112053, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25425.998000, 9687.992000, 1775.056051, 1775.056051, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26197.651398, 9429.466064, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25455.498000, 9375.800000, 2100.280060, 1389.344040, 229.040000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26169.322000, 9026.152000, 3489.624100, 3489.624100, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26601.244000, 8948.871000, 2150.368062, 2150.368062, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26358.477142, 8014.923538, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:14 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src76.gif