[Sun Jun  9 09:40:53 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (284.4, 115.9) = 18 0 27.93 -24 15 27.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 373.6 +/- 28.1
  Background counts = 99.6
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0009

[Sun Jun  9 09:41:02 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.28'
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.07 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.07"
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 49, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.855
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:43 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 56 for pass 0, mean size = 13.07"
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:45 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:46 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:46 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:48 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:48 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:42:48 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Warning, spatial fit 56 centroid is now closest to src. 58
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2388.670000, observed total counts = 2375.000000
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 57 = 1.326563 pixels
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 56 to 70
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] 2201.148300 total counts/ 2105.850000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.076689
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 57 = 1.326563 pixels
  Position = (285.4, 116.7) = 18 0 27.61 -24 15 23.6
  Extent = 5.7 (4.0-7.6)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 95.3 +/- 46.9
  Background counts = 2105.8
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.002
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source is confused with source 61
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source is confused with source 63
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source is confused with source 65
[Sun Jun  9 09:43:25 2013] Source is confused with source 72
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 5.75"
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] source mask rpix=1.3, npix_max = 13, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.905
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:57 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 54 for pass 1, mean size = 5.75"
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:59 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:59 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:44:59 2013] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:01 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:01 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54.csv
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:01 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:40 2013] Warning, spatial fit 54 centroid is now closest to src. 55
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  9 09:45:41 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:11 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(24781.022000, 10103.254000, 344.728810, 344.728810, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:11 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src57_src.reg
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:11 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (266, 97) - (305, 136)
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:11 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(24781.022000, 10103.254000, 574.548017, 1149.096033, X, Y) && !ellipse(26672.112000, 8927.234000, 1840.112053, 1840.112053, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23083.862244, 10541.976440, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22492.154906, 10474.655937, 2220.083444, 1452.714890, 230.591602, X, Y) && !ellipse(23826.789886, 10310.949066, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25161.218231, 9857.604805, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23096.973000, 9931.152000, 2070.712060, 258.839207, 13.044000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25425.998000, 9687.992000, 1775.056051, 1775.056051, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24616.000000, 9503.050865, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26197.651398, 9429.466064, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25455.498000, 9375.800000, 2100.280060, 1389.344040, 229.040000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26169.322000, 9026.152000, 3489.624100, 3489.624100, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26601.244000, 8948.871000, 2150.368062, 2150.368062, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25315.902893, 8395.326843, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24812.514648, 8593.524780, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24048.806091, 8861.170319, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun  9 09:47:11 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0503850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src57.gif